Minor edits correct grammar, formatting, broken links, or wording without changing the meaning.

Material updates change a factual claim, policy status, recommendation, methodology, interpretation, or conclusion.

Corrections address information that was inaccurate or misleading when published.

Articles display publication and last-reviewed dates. When a material update is made, the modification date should change and the article should explain what changed when that context helps the reader.

A cosmetic edit should not be presented as a substantive new review.

Google Ads and other platform-policy articles should be reviewed at least every 90 days and after a known policy announcement.

Technical SEO and analytics articles should generally be reviewed every 180 days or after a major platform change.

Medical or regulatory content should be re-reviewed after material source changes.

Readers can report a possible error through the contact page. A useful request includes the article URL, exact statement, reason it may be wrong, and a primary source or evidence.

Submissions are evaluated against the cited source, publication date, jurisdiction, and article context.

Confirmed errors are corrected as promptly as practical. Material corrections receive a visible note. Links, schema, direct answers, FAQs, and related claims are checked together so the correction is not limited to one paragraph.

When an article is no longer maintainable or useful, it may be consolidated, redirected, archived, or removed.

Case-study metrics and conclusions are not silently changed to make results appear stronger. If a methodology or metric was incorrect, the correction should explain the affected interpretation.